OverDiagnosis and Unshared Decision Making as Paradigm-constructed Anomalies [with Mette Kjer Kaltoft and Vije Kumar Rajput]
Measures of decision aid quality are preference-sensitive and interest-conflicted 1: normative measures (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft and Vije Kumar Rajput)
Measures of decision aid quality are preference-sensitive and interest-conflicted 2: empirical measures (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft and Vije Kumar Rajput)
COVID-19, the Swedish ‘Experiment’, and Me
Dichotomising Cost-Effectiveness undermines its ethical justification and potential contribution to health [Panel on SW Quadrant] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
Decision support to address the tragi-comedy of the Health Service Commons (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft and Vije Kumar Rajput)
PROMs need PRIMs: Standardised outcome measures lack the preference-sensitivity
needed in person-centred care (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
Bringing uncertainty inside personalised decision support (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Jesper Bo Nielsen)
Risk classifications interfere with Preference-Sensitive Decision Support (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
Translating the results of Discrete Choice Experiments into p/e/m-Health Decision Support Tools (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
A Multi-Criterial Support Tool for the Multimorbidity Decision in General Practice (with Vije Kumar Rajput and Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
Uncertainty-adjusted translation for preference-sensitive decision support (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
Shared decision-making with the empowered person, not the dependent patient (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft and Vije Kumar Rajput)
Shared Decision-Making: Person-Centred Care & The Values Agenda March 25-26
From ‘equity-sensitive’ clinical practice guidelines to equity–inclusive person–as-citizen decision support (with Vije Kumar Rajput and Mette Kjer Kaltoft) [Discussion by David Whitehurst]
Deciding how to decide: Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis is (probably) the future for both Health Technology Assessment and Shared Clinical Decision Making
Deciding how to decide
Deciding how to decide
Dual purpose, dual audience: MCDA-based tools can simultaneously support personal health decisions and educate persons and clinicians (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft and Jesper Bo Nielsen)
Preference-sensitive apomediative decision support is the key to facilitating self-produced health (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
Apomediative decision support tools are essential to ensure informed and preference-based consent in healthcare
Should uncertainty be incorporated in preference-sensitive decision support? [Poster] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft and Jesper Bo Nielsen)
MCDA is the future if we accept that the theoretically best
may be the enemy of the practically better
The pursuit of scientific rigour and complexity is hampering moves to person-centred decision making
What is required if the visionary boundary object ’Shared Decision Making’ is not to remain a mirage? [Poster] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft and Jesper Bo Nielsen)
MyDecisionEngagement: a formative, preference-sensitive dually-personalised measure for person-centred care [Poster] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft and Jesper Bo Nielsen)
Enhancing person-centred care and health decision literacy via multi-criteria based condition-specific decision support (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft) 10 October 2016
Where does Overdiagnosis fit in a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis? [Poster and Pitch] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Jesper Bo Nielsen and Glenn Salkeld)
Where does Overdiagnosis fit in a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis? [3 minute pitch] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Jesper Bo Nielsen and Glenn Salkeld)
Producing the BEANs needed for person-centred healthcare decision making requires translating the wisdom of the clinical crowd [Poster](with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Øystein Eiring, Jesper Bo Nielsen, and Glenn Salkeld)
The paradox of preference-sensitivity in patient-centred care measurement (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Jesper Bo Nielsen and Glenn Salkeld)
What sort of PROMs are appropriate in person-centred healthcare? (Answer: Dually-personalised PROMs) [Poster] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Jesper Bo Nielsen, and Glenn Salkeld)
Threshold-based guidelines threaten preference-sensitive decision making in person-centred care [Poster] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Jesper Bo Nielsen, and Glenn Salkeld)
Producing quality-adjusted opinions for preference-sensitive multi-criterial decision support [Poster] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Jesper Bo Nielsen, and Glenn Salkeld)
Person-centred shared decision making with informed consent: is it possible without multi-criterial decision analytic support?
Introduction to Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and MCDA-based decision support via Annalisa
Health Informatics can avoid committing symbolic violence by recognising and supporting generic decision-making competencies (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Jesper Bo Nielsen and Glenn Salkeld)
Enhancing both healthcare provider feedback and personal health literacy: dual use of a decision quality measure (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Jesper Bo Nielsen and Glenn Salkeld)
Introduction to Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) as a way of bringing SDM and EBP together
Person-centred healthcare requires a re-conception, not renaissance of evidence-based practice
Walking the talk of user involvement and person-centred decision making: perspectives, programs and pollination
Decision Support for Person-centred Healthcare
Enhancing shared decision making through assessment of patient-clinician concordance on decision quality (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Warwick Selby, Glenn Salkeld and Jesper Bo Nielsen)
Decisional equipoise is not decisional conflict: Avoiding the false clarity bias in the evaluation of decision aids and shared decision making processes [Poster] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Robin Turner, Jesper Bo Nielsen, Glenn Salkeld, and Michelle Cunich)
Addressing preference heterogeneity in public health policy by combining Cluster Analysis and Multi-Criterial Decision Analysis (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Jesper Bo Nielsen, Robin Turner, Glenn Salkeld and Michelle Cunich)
Nursing informatics, ethics and decisions: implications for translational research [Poster] (Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Jesper Bo Nielsen, and Glenn Salkeld)
Person-centred healthcare and public health policy: the role of MCDA and Cluster Analysis in responding to preference heterogeneity
Addressing the disconnect between public health science and personalised health care: the potential role of cluster analysis in combination with multi-criteria decision analysis [Poster] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Robin Turner, Jesper Bo Nielsen, Glenn Salkeld and Michelle Cunich) Paper here
Mapping the translation challenge [Poster]
Economic aspects of online decision support: values and virtues [2/3 session: ”Providing and Evaluating Decision Support in Healthcare by Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis”] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft, Michelle Cunich and Glenn Salkeld)
Decision Quality, Decision Effectiveness and Decision Resources: The contribution of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis-based support for individual and population level healthcare decisions and its translational implications (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
Online interactive decision support in IBD (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
Against risk
Meet Annalisa of Judemakia, your generic template for personalised patient decision support
MCDA in Patient-Centred HTA + why enhanced Mixed Treatment Comparisons are crucial
Supporting, documenting and evaluating the patient-centred decision via Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis [with Mette Kjer Kaltoft]
Supporting, documenting and evaluating the patient-centred decision via Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
Translation for patient-centred healthcare: the role of online interactive decision support
Supporting, documenting and evaluating the patient-centred decisionmvia online multi-criteria decision analysis [with Mette Kjer Kaltoft]
Translation in a Patient-Centred Healthcare System: The Role of Online Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis [with Mette Kjer Kaltoft]
Florence Nightingale meets Annalisa… on a handheld Tablet [Poster] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
Innovative nursing approaches to better decision communication and concordance in Sexual and Reproductive Health [Poster] (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft]
Translation for Health
Supporting, documenting and evaluating the patient-centred transfer decision via online multi-criteria decision analysis (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
Online prioritisation via Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Annalisa 2.0+
Introduction to MCDA via Annalisa 2.0+ [Introduction to Bone Research, Amgen visit]
Literature review on the use of handhelds in acute care: towards a patient-centred Health Technology Assessment (HTA) (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft and Grete Kirketerp)
Towards relevant translation for ‘wicked’ sociotechnical systems: embedding and evaluating web-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
Deciding how to decide
The future of HTA is MCDA or, Why ‘taking into account’ is not NICE [Poster]
Value of Analysis Analysis or, Decision Resource Effectiveness Analysis [Poster]
A new map of the world of judgment and decision making in health – and a new tool for delivering the best medicine
Evidence-based medicine in practice? the NICE initiative in Britain
Distinguishing meta-preferences for relationship model and decision mode is essential in designing and evaluating physician-patient decision support systems
A new map of the world of health decision making – and its implications for medical education and practice
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis via Annalisa: A Bayesian Graphical Modelling Approach
Decision Technologies for public health – the Bayesian Decision Analytic alternative
A new map of the world of health decision making – and its implications for the medical curriculum
Promoting health through decision-analysis based support: the ‘MyWay’ contraceptive guidance program (with Mette Kjer Kaltoft)
A new map of the world of health decision making – and an ethical code for Decision Analysts
How good are you at assessing the chance that your answer is correct? Prober will tell you.
Decision Technologies and the Management of Medicines: balancing Analysis and Intuition
Decision Technologies and Health: balancing Analysis and Intuition
Decision Technologies in Public Health: Bayesian Intuition or Bayesian Analysis?
Delivering quality Patient-centred Care via web-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis [Poster]
Promoting health through better decisions
Decision Technologies in Public Health and the roles of Health Impact Estimation, Health Impact Assessment and Health Impact Analysis
Whither trial-based economic evaluation for healthcare decision making? [Discussant of Sculpher, Claxton, Drummond, McCabe paper]
Decision Technologies in Public Health (6 sessions) 1: Mapping the world of public health decision making. 2: Evidence-based approaches – Health Impact Estimation and Assessment. 3 Decision and Health Impact Analysis. 4: Probability Assessment and Evaluation. 5: Eliciting and integrating values into decisions. 6: Cost-effectiveness, ethics and the impossibility of being NICE in public health.
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 17 (1), 83–90.
Health Impact: its estimation, assessment and analysis
The difficulty (impossibility?) of being NICE: disentangling Knowledge Technologies and Decision Technologies [Paper]
Values elicitation in ‘Shared Decision Making’: it all depends on the Decision Technology
Decision Technologies and Health: Can the model in the middle end the muddle?
The ‘Bermuda Triangle’ of health care evaluation: cost-effectiveness, equity and patient preferences